The story of determining longitude is a compelling historical case that combines science, navigation, problem-solving, and human perseverance. It makes a great interdisciplinary lesson blending geography, physics, history, and critical thinking.
Lesson Plan:
Grade Level: Upper Primary to Lower Secondary (ages 11–14)
Subjects: Geography, History, Science (Physics), STEM
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will:
Materials Needed
Lesson Activities
Mini-Thought-Experiment:
Group Task (Worksheet-guided):
The Longitude Problem
………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
If your local noon happens at 3 hours after Greenwich noon, what is your longitude?
______ hours × 15° = _______°
Are you east or west? ___________
It is important to explicitly introduce cartographic projection as a central concept. Maps should be presented as representations of reality rather than neutral copies, emphasizing that every projection involves simplifications and distortions. This can be illustrated with a concrete example, such as the overrepresentation of Arctic regions in the Mercator projection, which demonstrates how area and shape can be distorted depending on the chosen projection.
A connection to Mathematics is self-evident, particularly by referring to the concepts of proportion, scale, and area, which are essential for understanding map representations and distortions.
When addressing the topic of solving longitude, it would be useful to explain more clearly why determining latitude was considerably easier than determining longitude. Latitude could be measured relatively simply through observations of the Polar Star in the Northern Hemisphere or the Sun’s angle, whereas longitude required accurate timekeeping and therefore posed a much greater challenge.